Talk:Medieval: Total War

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articleMedieval: Total War has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
May 4, 2009Good article nomineeListed
WikiProject Video games (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Article Rewrite[edit]

I am currently carrying out a major rewrite of this article, section by section, to make it better presented, more readable and generally in line with article policies. Some information I have or will be removed, such as excessive info, faction lists, game walkthroughs etc, according to WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:VGSCOPE. Should anyone have any comments on this, feel free to tell me here or on my talkpage QueenCake (talk) 21:28, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Rewrite finished now, alot better QueenCake (talk) 21:51, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
I think you should learn how to spell a lot first. There is a free spellchecker on this forum you know. Okay, thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.106.61.194 (talk) 19:22, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Avoiding a grammatical tangle[edit]

It looks like the sentence "Glorious Achievements" are another game mode has suffered from a well-meaning "is/are" edit at some stage, on the basis that (name_of_the_mode) just happens to end in the letter 's'. Since "GAs" is a proper noun and 'mode' is singular, "Glorious Achievements" is another game mode would be grammatically correct. However, in order to avoid back-and-forth edits due to others falling into this trap, I rearranged the whole sentence. EatYerGreens (talk) 07:01, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Good Work, probably my fault :) QueenCake (talk) 22:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 Sorry about this question but i would like to know if the orig. game can be made to play with the up dated computer if so I would like to purchess the medieval total war, for the one I have well not load. The reason I'm 70 and i like to keep the games i enjoy simple.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.253.161.97 (talk) 04:02, 1 October 2012 (UTC) 

Steam release[edit]

It has been released on Steam, but there are some issues making it nearly unplayable. It tends to crash when several stacks are attacking and/or defending. 91.186.70.2 (talk) 12:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Medieval: Total War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)