Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of future nations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is silly. The intended content already exists at List of unrecognized countries, list of disputed or occupied areas, and List of active autonomist and secessionist movements. --Jiang 19:47, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete. This information should be merged to the appropriate articles given by Jiang siroχo 20:12, Jun 29, 2004 (UTC)
  • This could just have been merged with those and a redirect made. Morwen - Talk 20:19, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Is the author of this article an attested psychic? I for one don't believe Wikipedia has forseeing the future as one of its functions. Fire Star 20:36, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • If there is any information not contained in List of unrecognized countries, merge. Otherwise, just delete. Andris 20:41, Jun 29, 2004 (UTC)
  • A merge is not appropriate. The information is already duplicated. A redirect will be misleading - these are in some cases already "nations" or de facto sovereign states. It is not wikipedia's business to make predictions as the word "future" does. --Jiang 21:07, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete - Tεxτurε 21:50, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: pure supposition, no fact. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 22:03, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: I hope it's just a case of someone accidentally creating a new article without knowing that its contents were already present under a more logically named entry. List of future lottery numbers is the article I'm holding out for. Geogre 00:29, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
    • The muse is coming over me now... OooooOOOoooOOOoohh... 2... 5... 16... 33... 42... 48... If you win you owe me a million bucks -- Graham ☺ | Talk 10:42, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Cool! Drop me a line on my user page when that happens. In the meantime, delete this one as speculation. - Lucky 6.9 05:18, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete - There is no reason for speculation Gangulf 06:38, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- pne 07:05, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Speculation, not fact, and therefore inherently POV. Average Earthman 12:11, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. DJ Clayworth 16:33, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)