Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Mr-Natural-Health/Evidence
The chief complaints logged appear to be:
- Personal attacks
- Failure to follow NPOV
- Failure to respect bans handed down on other users
- Inflammatory use of rv vandalism as an edit summary / abusive edit summaries
Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Please choose an appropriate header for your evidence and sign your comments with your name.
This page is not for general discussion - for that, see talk page.
If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Please do this under a seperate header, to seperate your response from the original evidence.
Be aware that the arbitrators may at times rework this page to try to make it more coherent.
- 1 Relevant article disputes
- 2 Abusiveness in edit summaries
- 3 Relevant behavior on talk pages
- 3.1 Trouble accepting others may have a valid point of view or be working towards NPOV
- 3.2 Offering to help banned users work around bans
- 3.3 Attempted enclosure of articles
- 3.4 Personal attacks on others; cannot distinguish questioning his edits from "personal attacks"
- 3.5 Personal attacks
- 3.6 Disregard for those making requests
- 4 Section to add other articles which have/had CAM (Complimentary/Alternative Medicine) boxes which you consider dubious
Relevant article disputes
Evidence of not working collaboratively for the good of an article
MNH does not work with people in order to produce a good article. He see's editing as a war between himself and what he refers to as the "science people"
On alternative medicine he repeately removed a quote by Richard Dawkins. He made [this edit] in order to say "David, are you going to footnote this quote of Dawkins in the article or am I going to have to delete this unattributed assertion?
implying presumably that he didn't believe that Dawkins actually said what he was being quoted as saying. He gave people 1 hour and 16 mins! to respond before deleting the quote with the edit summary
"Time is up David! The footnote has been in talk for quite some time, now. Too lazy to add it to the article? No problem! I will just delete this non-footnoted stupid quote of yours. 
This is despite the fact that Mike had already told him where the quote came from on the talk page earlier [here]
On Palliative care he got into an edit war over if it was part of alternative medicine category. As part of that edit war he reverted a rewrite of of the intro to the article in order to get the category:Alternative medicine line back in. When it was pointed out (in the edit summary of a revert by theresa knott) that he had reverted the new intro as well he re-reverted with the following comment:
"rv when you do a revert you throw the baby out with the bath water, TK. Just thought that you might want to know".
He was told on a number of occasions to stop adding his Alt.Med box or a smaller set of links and yet they appear again and again.
This is with 5 or 6 different users removing them over time and yet he keeps putting them back despite people explaining the reason for their removal.
See the history page for evidence of Mr Natural Health's multiple insertion of the same content or variations on a theme and also the removal by a number of (Increasingly frustrated) different editors.
Note also the lack of meaningful dialogue and the unacceptable use of rv vandalism as an edit summary.
World Health Organisation
- MNH adds CAM box to bottom of article: 
- User:Kd4ttc deletes it. 
- MNH adds category:Alternative medicine 
- User:Bodnotbod deletes it ("The World Health Organisation is not an alternative medicine") 
- MNH restores a CAM box (no edit summary) 
- MNH has edit skirmish with User:Geni Note here he now has TWO things referring to CAM in the same terms in an article with scanty relation to CAM!
MNH now inserts completely off-topic and bemusing content- oops, that was someone else.
- MNH reinserts the CAM Tiny box  has to fix his bad link, gets it wrong again so, third time lucky
- User:Geni removes a controversial CAM related statement inviting MNH to see Talk and User:Kd4ttc again removes the CAM Tiny box so... MNH reverts using "rv vandalism" as an Edit Summary
- User:theresa knott removes CAM Tiny box 
- User:126.96.36.199 removes controversial statement relating to general definitions of health. 
Summary of WHO skirmish
- FIVE users have had to spend time deleting irrelevant content from ONE man (please consider how this holds back more valuable work).
- At one stage MNH makes the article very strange
- At no point does MNH use Talk:World_Health_Organization in spite of two explicit invitations to do so.
- After making some other edits MNH inserts the inevitable CAM box  which he then makes a minor adjustment to  and minor layout change 
- User:Fuelbottle removes the box 
- MNH reinserts the box with the justification that he wrote the article. "It is positively a *major* on the philosophy of alternative medicine. So, please stop your point-blank vandalism of my edits."
- MNH switches from one of his boxes to a different one  whilst asserting in the edit summary "rv proven vandalism of Fuelbottle / this article has an infobox in it because it is 100% / I am in the process of reporting the vandalism of Fuelbottle. This will be completed within a few minutes."
- These steps have basically been repeating themselves, see the History page for the list.
Related (to Lifestyle Diseases) edits on other pages
- User:Fuelbottle approached MNH about his box on MNH's Talk page in polite terms ("Hi, I removed the CAM box on some pages because even though they may be somewhat related to CAM, CAM is not their main category[snip]" to receive this response "Hi! See Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress -- I reported catching User:Fuelbottle in the act of vandalizing a large number of my edits just a matter of 30 minutes or so ago."
- User:Fuelbottle has been making something of a project of addressing the articles that contain CAM boxes. As a result MNH has reported him on Vandalism in progress .
summary of Lifestyle Diseases skirmish
- Insertion of CAM box again causes an edit tussle - note: with a different user, uninvolved with World Health Organization and Clinical depression.
- Another instance of a user being called a vandal.
Abusiveness in edit summaries
Alternative Medicine history],
- A troll is a troll, even with the words science in front of it. I am declining be goaded further by these trolls. I am going back to working on the bigger picture. Have fun David, while I excell!
- Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Mr-Natural-Health
-  Yes, my how the trolls and bigots babble on so on Wikipedia! I really must stop wasting my time on Wikipedia. and While I would love to continue wasting huge amounts of time dealing with morons and bigots on Wikipedia, I happen to have a life. My original characterization of the gang of thugs on Wikipedia has bee from the previus edit
-  David Gerard, and his ilk, are bigots by the book: plain and simple.
-  What !@#$%^&* decided to make the screen smaller for unregistered viewers? Was it you? I should have known!
- Talk:Chelation therapy
- First edit (so no diff)  - Any alternative medicine article created by Geni is pure pollution.
- Naturopathic Medicine
-  Removing total unattributed nonsense added by a known vandal. Keep your trash out of this article, Geni! Lookup the definition of footnote in a dictionary!
-  I am sure that Hitler held similar views about Heinrich Himmler. Just another case of the fox guarding the hen house.
-  And, I bet Hitler got mad at the Jews complaining so much about being being in Auschwitz, too. Your comments have made my day.
- I agree. It is an obvious violation of the wikipedia's NPOV policy that was added by a troll
- -  - rv I have shownt that this editor on my last two reverts clearly does not know what they are talking about.
- MNH is still referring to pretty much all his reinstatements of material as rv vandalism - see screengrab.bodnotbod 01:29, Jun 11, 2004 (UTC)
Relevant behavior on talk pages
Trouble accepting others may have a valid point of view or be working towards NPOV
MNH appears not to grasp NPOV   . He is given to combative discussion on talk pages - he appears to see his mission as pushing one side, rather than improving an article ( ). He seems to actually believe that those of differing view are "trolls" ( talk page, User:Mr-Natural-Health/2wB1g9Gq) and "liars" (  ) rather than being people who disagree with him.
Offering to help banned users work around bans
Attempted enclosure of articles
He seems to believe he can take ownership of articles and enforce his views on who should be allowed to edit them . He views article editing as a battle with winners and losers       . His combative attitude has already discouraged others from contributing to articles he edits (Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Theresa_Knott#Response). The analysis there is that his behaviour represents attempted enclosure of alternative medicine articles on Wikipedia.
He has constructed a personal style guide for alternative medicine articles (Wikipedia:Wikiproject:Alternative Medicine/Standards of Quality), which is far from an objectionable idea in itself, but he represents it as enforceable Wikipedia policy     , removes edits of others using it as justification as if it's hard Wikipedia policy    and removes others' questions as to it being used like this .
Personal attacks on others; cannot distinguish questioning his edits from "personal attacks"
He makes personal attacks on others      and maintains pages of personal attacks on others on his user page (User:Mr-Natural-Health/2wB1g9Gq, User:Mr-Natural-Health/6pV1g8Gq). Apparently, getting into a disagreement with him warrants comparisons to Hitler and Nazis  .
See also: Abusiveness in edit summaries for personal attacks in edit summaries)
- He says on talk:clinical depression that "science people" are "bigoted, obnoxious, time wasting" and "a bunch of ignorant bigots"
- on AM to erich gasboy Hello, Bigot? How are all you bigots doing today?
- on AM to Theresa knott  I bet TK looks uglier than than she talks
- on AM to Xgkkp  I have no duty to educate the uneducated
- And  Totally confused people, such as yourself, should do more reading. You certainly do not get out much do you?
- on Talk:Clinical_depression to Bodnotnod  "I suggest that you educate yourself, some. I have no duty to educate people who are 30 years out of date. Cheers" (If education isn't an aim, what is?)
- In the context of being asked to respond to the debate on the talk page: "Do you really think that I am going to waste my time wading through the above garbage that was written by a bunch of ignorant bigots?" 
- on Talk:Chelation therapy (after listing page on votes for deletion) "Any alternative medicine article created by Geni is pure pollution."
Disregard for those making requests
I wrote the following on MNH's Talk Page: "I politely request that you stop adding your CAM boxes, links, and use of rv vandalism as an edit summary whilst your arbitration is in process. --bodnotbod 01:43, Jun 11, 2004 (UTC)
Soon after it was simply removed with no dialogue whatsoever (on my page, or his): . I thought this may be simple archiving but posts predating mine remained, so it seems like a selective cull. --bodnotbod 21:03, Jun 25, 2004 (UTC)
Section to add other articles which have/had CAM (Complimentary/Alternative Medicine) boxes which you consider dubious
The purpose of this section is to demonstrate that MNH has zero ability to apply his boxes - which I replicate here...
...to show their overweening impact - zero ability to apply them with discretion, intelligence, consideration for others or forethought
- Weight training see 
- Aerobic exercise see 
- Body building see 
- Diagnosis see 
- Disease - see 
- Exercise see bottom of the page as it stands as of 25th June.
- Food the article on FOOD! ffs, see 
- Food additive see 
- List of herbs and spices see 
- High blood cholestrol 
- High blood pressure see 
- Hygiene see 
- Inflammation see 
- Insomnia see 
Topics under J-Z still to come...