This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP. dbenbenn | talk 01:26, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep: he's a real person, one of Shivaji's lieutenants. probly just needs cleanup. Nateji77 12:58, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep yet needs serious cleanup. A reasonably important historical figure of note, I believe he deserves at least a brief article. HyperZonk 23:00, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable - less than 50 Google hits. Megan1967 02:06, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Notable enough. Xezbeth 08:17, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)
Keep, helpful, WP was made for historical stuff like this (among other things). Wyss 12:16, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I say Keep -- clearly notable and historically interesting. As I have said elsewhere today, you can't just list for VfD as "Not a notable person, unclear if he's factual or mythological" without doing a bit of homework! However this may be a copyright violation since it appears to be lifted directly from HowardB 16:51, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.